The 10th Circuit Court in Denver, Colorado today upheld an injunction against the implementation of Oklahoma SQ 755, a constitutional amendment that instructed judges not to consider foreign laws in making their decisions, it included sharia law, I believe, in that it is the ruling order used in a number of Islamic countries and is the basis for their laws. The amendment passed overwhelmingly in the fall of 2010. The amendment reads, in part:
“The courts shall not look to the legal precepts of other nations or cultures. Specifically, the courts shall not consider international law or Sharia law.”
In their brief, the court ignored that Muneer Awad, the director of Oklahoma's chapter of CAIR, an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood infrastructure in the U.S., did not actually demonstrate any harm from the amendment (he merely claimed he would be). The court, for some reason, agreed with him. Yet, they said the state failed to show a compelling interest because there weren't any problems sharia law has caused and faulted them for it! So, if I read this right, the state had to show a problem first and Awad didn't. An imam in Oklahoma City claimed in a local paper he 's testified in court many times about Islamic code which should be reviewed for this important case. Maybe he should be deposed to get more information about these many cases. Where is the Oklahoma Attorney General's office here?
I also noticed the court didn't distinguish sharia practices (Islamic religious guidelines) from sharia law, which could be a big mistake. In fact, they may have ignored, or were not aware, Awad appears to use the two terms interchangeably in his brief bluring the difference. This may have been intentional. These two terms should be made crystal clear by the court.
Shortly after SQ 755 passed, Muneer Awad claimed on national TV its success was based on a campaign of fear, hate and violence, a blatantly false statement. There was not one incident of violence that I am aware. Awad also uses non stop name-calling bullying tactcs that continues to this day. The hipocrisy in this is so clear when you review CAIR's campaign against school bullying, which includes verbal intimidation and harrassment! They use the very tactic they call bullying.
State Sen. Anthony Sykes, who led the Senate's effort to bring this amendment to a public vote issued a statement emphasizing this matter is, and will continue to be, an on-going effort:
“On Tuesday the federal appeals court in Denver attempted to silence the voice of 70 percent of Oklahoma voters. At some point we have to decide whether this is a country of by and for the judges, or of by and for the people. How far will the people let them go? This ruling is right along with legalizing abortion and forced busing of school children.”
“The issue raised by this constitutional amendment is very simple – you are either for Sharia law or you are against it.”>“This is just the first battle in an ongoing effort. Although the courts have attempted to silence the voice of the people, I won’t let that happen. I’ll continue fighting to restore government to the people.”
The case goes back to Oklahoma federal court who will decide on the constitutionality of the law, itself. I worry a court will unwittingly rule in favor of sharia law which will be used by Muslim activists in the future to advance the use of it in the U.S.
A number of other states are also considering bans on foreign laws.
-----
Also See:
Post on Muneer Awad
You are again patently false in your claims - basing your entire post on half truths. As you claim "Sharia law are laws a number of Islamic countries use, the religious aspect of the law is irrelevant." Well, religion is clearly NOT an irrelevant aspect considering the fact you cite a religion in this claim. i.e. Islam.
Furthermore, You should include the FULL TEXT of the measure. I have taken the liberty of doing this for you:
SQ 755 Cont'd: "Sharia Law is Islamic law. It is based on two principal sources, the Koran and the teaching of Mohammed."
^^^^THIS is a blatant and unconstitutional swipe at an entire religion. You know that if it was any other religion, texts, and figures - i.e. "Rabinnical Law is Judaic Law. It is based on the principle source of the Torah and the teachings of Abraham and Moses." it would be labeled anti-Semitic in a HEARTBEAT.
Posted by: A Facebook User | April 26, 2012 at 04:14 PM
You appear to be the classic liberal college student, Nolan Kraszkiewicz. You may find as you gain wisdom over the years your views could change. What you think is up now you may find to be down later. One can only hope... You see, I was a liberal once myself, not as far-left as you but I was clearly liberal.
You are equating private religious worship and principles for daily guidance with religious laws that rule over others in certain Islamic countries. They are NOT the same thing.
Foreign laws are laws that are the ruling order of a country. Of those foreign laws, sharia law is what rules over citizens in many Islamic countries. Because sharia law is based on a relgion isn't relevant for the purpose of SQ 755. What's relevant is it's a type of FOREIGN LAW that SQ 755 didn't want to be used or considered in making judicial decisions in state courts. I believe a law like this has already passed and is in effect in one or two states.
If a country is RULED by a set of religious laws it's certainly NOT a constitutional swipe at private religious practices. Sharia law - the laws used in Sharia-ruled countries is far different from the daily religious guidelines/principles Muslim's follow.
A post on your website certainly speaks volumes about you where I read you referenced a website called evilbible.com in "Top 10 Signs You're a Fundamentalist Christian"
http://www.thenolank.com/2011/10/top-ten-signs-youre-fundamentalist.html
I also noticed you wrote about the Islamic supremacist radical Sayyid Quib in one of your mid-terms essays. You referred to him as a theologian.
Posted by: Brandi. Eave | May 07, 2012 at 10:27 AM
I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your site. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Excellent work!
www.wayneelsey.com/believe/where-passion-meets-experience/
Posted by: John Hursan | January 02, 2013 at 04:20 AM